Current status of the Ning Platform is always available on the Ning Status Blog.

Forum

NC for Hire

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS CSS4

There has never been a CSS4. There will never be a CSS4. CSS4 is not a thing that exists.

The term "CSS3" refers to everything published after CSS 2.1.
CSS is on its last version as a language as a whole, so it would be appropriate to just drop the number entirely and refer to everything from now on as just "CSS".

"But", you might object, "I saw things like CSS4 Images, or Selectors 4! Aren't they part of CSS4?".

No. As I just said, there is no CSS4.

I recently was contacted by someone needing help on their network who explained to me that the 'other guy they were talking to' promised to make their site CSS4 compatible.  Then they asked me when CSS4 was going to be available.  So, here is your answer the next time a swindler tries to take your money while trying to promise you the world.  

Actually, promising you the world would be better because the world actually exists.  CSS4 doesn't.  Just fair warning.

You need to be a member of Ning Creators Network to add comments!

Join Ning Creators Network

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascading_Style_Sheets#CSS_4

    http://www.w3.org/TR/selectors4/

    Still, someone promising to make a site CSS4 compatible is silly (right now).

    • NC for Hire

      While trying to finish CSS 2.1, the CSSWG realized that big monolithic "versions" weren't any good. They were difficult to maintain, and slow to develop.

      Instead, they decided to split up the CSS language into a bunch of independent modules. Each module can level up independently, and contains only a smallish set of features, so it's harder for a large set of features to be slowed down by a single stubborn feature.

      Some of our modules start out at level 3, if they extend something from CSS2.1. Others start out at level 1, if they're something new (for example, Flexbox). However, the level that a module is at has no correlation with what version of CSS it's in. They're all CSS3 (or just CSS), regardless of what level they're at.

      Our URLs don't help the matter much, of course. We use URLs with things like css4-backgrounds in them, which totally sounds like CSS4.  All that means is that it's CSS Background & Borders Level 4, which is implicitly part of CSS3 (or just CSS).

      So, now you know. There's no such thing as CSS4. There is only CSS, and each module can level up independently. Pass it on!

      • Ok, so you are quoting one guy who is seemingly arguing semantics http://www.xanthir.com/b4Ko0

        However, if I look at w3c, I see mention of CSS 1, CSS 2.1, Selectors Level 3 and Selectors Level 4. So are you going to say that anyone who says "CSS3 compatible" is a swindler also? Its semantics really, and I think its a little over the top to accuse someone of being a swindler because they called something CSS4 instead of "Selectors Level 4."

        • NC for Hire

          i never accused anyone directly of being a swindler and yes as the link above describes, there is a difference.  I am constantly trying to help NCs who more often than not have little knowledge of web development sift through the lies that some people tell them to make a buck.  that is all.  i appreciate your feedback as it is equally helpful for trying to 'turn a light on' in the mind of NCs who believe anything they are told when they need help.  And btw, the guy I am quoting is well respected and knows what he is talking about.  I believe you know what you are doing as well Ron and value your input.  Please feel free to inject anything else you may know related to this subject for my own edification as well as that of others..

          Thanks Ron..

          • No problem, and thanks for not taking me the wrong way - For a technical IRC chatroom semantics argument, the author is correct. But the point I'm trying to make is that developers inappropriately use terms all the time, and it doesn't necessarily mean they don't know what they are doing or are trying to mislead anyone. 

            That being said, I think the important part that we both neglected to mention in this discussion is that "CSS4 compatible" or even "CSS3 compatible" are ambiguous terms that should raise eyebrows for website owners for a completely different reason. Unless the term means that they aren't using any deprecated features or syntax, that usually means they are using new features. 

            If I put a bunch of features in your site that are from CSS3, that means a large block of your users with older browsers won't be able to see any of the new features, and since many designers don't know what the term "graceful degradation" means, let alone bother implementing it, more often than not, the user will be faced with giant blank spaces or jumbled elements that are not only hideous, but don't even make sense. 

            • NC for Hire

              excellent points!   I see a lot of misuse of the text shadowing and towering, insets, strokes etc all of the time on Ning networks and the truth of the matter is, you have to build for your members.  If you know that the majority of your members are over 50 yrs of age, if it common sense to assume many of them are using outdated browsers and older machines which simply cannot render much of what CSS3 has to offer..

              • It's a classic case of "just because you can, doesn't mean you should."

                Of course, you could solve this all by adding this to your site:

                <script language="javascript">
                <!--
                if (navigator.appName == "Microsoft Internet Explorer") {
                document.location = "https://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/browser/";
                } else {
                document.location = "http://www.domain.com/realhomepage.html";
                }
                // -->
                </script>

                Just kidding of course ;-)

This reply was deleted.

Search the Creators Network

Latest Activity

Ron left a comment for Randy L. Vollett
"Hey Randy, I saw your banner problem post and it would help if you can send me more details about y…"
9 hours ago
George H. Compton IV replied to JFarrow's discussion Add Some POWr to Your Ning Community
"Pretty cool. JF, I'm going to have to try this out. Thank you for sharing."
10 hours ago
George H. Compton IV replied to George H. Compton IV's discussion Tip any network.. Graphical loader interface. Hide your ugly bounce rate.
"LOL Dave, I don't know about that but thank you :-)"
10 hours ago
Fire-Tech replied to Luke Jones's discussion Did anyone even want Ning 3.0? ,
"+1"
10 hours ago
Fire-Tech replied to Luke Jones's discussion Did anyone even want Ning 3.0? ,
"+1"
10 hours ago
SweetPotato replied to Mary Jane Peterson's discussion New Site with 3.0
"The idea of a community for that niche and therefore potential customers is still a great one. Just…"
13 hours ago
JFarrow replied to Luke Jones's discussion Did anyone even want Ning 3.0? ,
"well said"
14 hours ago
JFarrow replied to Mary Jane Peterson's discussion New Site with 3.0
"should be under 12 characters"
14 hours ago
JFarrow replied to JFarrow's discussion Add Some POWr to Your Ning Community
"Update:  POWr has added an official tutorial on how to best use POWr plugins for Ning websites.  I…"
15 hours ago
Mary Jane Peterson replied to Mary Jane Peterson's discussion New Site with 3.0
"Thank you , for all your views ,  I am now thinking of closing this site down ,  "
16 hours ago
Strumelia replied to Mary Jane Peterson's discussion New Site with 3.0
"They probably do still freak out about art photography and nipples and such, and yet they don't car…"
17 hours ago
Eve Bellator replied to Mary Jane Peterson's discussion New Site with 3.0
"Great point! "
17 hours ago
Kos replied to Lakhassia's discussion How to upgrade to 3.0 to 2.0
"Contact ning and come back here and let us know if they do it.  It will be interesting to watch the…"
21 hours ago
Strumelia replied to Luke Jones's discussion Cometchat are going to be the ones to save Ning
"Thank you.  I got the footer code mystery solved myself because I asked SoaringEagle on here- he mo…"
21 hours ago
soaringeagle replied to soaringeagle's discussion ning vs jamroom
"sure well depends on how much ya need  done"
21 hours ago
Kos replied to Trish White's discussion TEXT BOX NOT WORKING AGAIN
"Design Studio - Custom CSS area
None in there?"
22 hours ago
Caron Jane Lyon / Katie Reve left a comment for Ron
"Hi Ron, Can you give me a summary of where Ning is at? Re 2.0 3.0? I have several networks all crea…"
22 hours ago
fabiola replied to soaringeagle's discussion ning vs jamroom
"Hello soaringeagle 
I appreciate your valuable information.  Few weeks ago I found out about the "p…"
yesterday
Ron replied to Luke Jones's discussion Cometchat are going to be the ones to save Ning
"yes, just as I thought. thanks."
yesterday
Anant Garg replied to Luke Jones's discussion Cometchat are going to be the ones to save Ning
"Thank you for your feedback. Yes, we are working on making our website clearer. 
Regarding the temp…"
yesterday
More…