Current status of the Ning Platform is always available on the Ning Status Blog.

Forum

NC for Hire

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS CSS4

There has never been a CSS4. There will never be a CSS4. CSS4 is not a thing that exists.

The term "CSS3" refers to everything published after CSS 2.1.
CSS is on its last version as a language as a whole, so it would be appropriate to just drop the number entirely and refer to everything from now on as just "CSS".

"But", you might object, "I saw things like CSS4 Images, or Selectors 4! Aren't they part of CSS4?".

No. As I just said, there is no CSS4.

I recently was contacted by someone needing help on their network who explained to me that the 'other guy they were talking to' promised to make their site CSS4 compatible.  Then they asked me when CSS4 was going to be available.  So, here is your answer the next time a swindler tries to take your money while trying to promise you the world.  

Actually, promising you the world would be better because the world actually exists.  CSS4 doesn't.  Just fair warning.

You need to be a member of Ning Creators Network to add comments!

Join Ning Creators Network

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascading_Style_Sheets#CSS_4

    http://www.w3.org/TR/selectors4/

    Still, someone promising to make a site CSS4 compatible is silly (right now).

    • NC for Hire

      While trying to finish CSS 2.1, the CSSWG realized that big monolithic "versions" weren't any good. They were difficult to maintain, and slow to develop.

      Instead, they decided to split up the CSS language into a bunch of independent modules. Each module can level up independently, and contains only a smallish set of features, so it's harder for a large set of features to be slowed down by a single stubborn feature.

      Some of our modules start out at level 3, if they extend something from CSS2.1. Others start out at level 1, if they're something new (for example, Flexbox). However, the level that a module is at has no correlation with what version of CSS it's in. They're all CSS3 (or just CSS), regardless of what level they're at.

      Our URLs don't help the matter much, of course. We use URLs with things like css4-backgrounds in them, which totally sounds like CSS4.  All that means is that it's CSS Background & Borders Level 4, which is implicitly part of CSS3 (or just CSS).

      So, now you know. There's no such thing as CSS4. There is only CSS, and each module can level up independently. Pass it on!

      • Ok, so you are quoting one guy who is seemingly arguing semantics http://www.xanthir.com/b4Ko0

        However, if I look at w3c, I see mention of CSS 1, CSS 2.1, Selectors Level 3 and Selectors Level 4. So are you going to say that anyone who says "CSS3 compatible" is a swindler also? Its semantics really, and I think its a little over the top to accuse someone of being a swindler because they called something CSS4 instead of "Selectors Level 4."

        • NC for Hire

          i never accused anyone directly of being a swindler and yes as the link above describes, there is a difference.  I am constantly trying to help NCs who more often than not have little knowledge of web development sift through the lies that some people tell them to make a buck.  that is all.  i appreciate your feedback as it is equally helpful for trying to 'turn a light on' in the mind of NCs who believe anything they are told when they need help.  And btw, the guy I am quoting is well respected and knows what he is talking about.  I believe you know what you are doing as well Ron and value your input.  Please feel free to inject anything else you may know related to this subject for my own edification as well as that of others..

          Thanks Ron..

          • No problem, and thanks for not taking me the wrong way - For a technical IRC chatroom semantics argument, the author is correct. But the point I'm trying to make is that developers inappropriately use terms all the time, and it doesn't necessarily mean they don't know what they are doing or are trying to mislead anyone. 

            That being said, I think the important part that we both neglected to mention in this discussion is that "CSS4 compatible" or even "CSS3 compatible" are ambiguous terms that should raise eyebrows for website owners for a completely different reason. Unless the term means that they aren't using any deprecated features or syntax, that usually means they are using new features. 

            If I put a bunch of features in your site that are from CSS3, that means a large block of your users with older browsers won't be able to see any of the new features, and since many designers don't know what the term "graceful degradation" means, let alone bother implementing it, more often than not, the user will be faced with giant blank spaces or jumbled elements that are not only hideous, but don't even make sense. 

            • NC for Hire

              excellent points!   I see a lot of misuse of the text shadowing and towering, insets, strokes etc all of the time on Ning networks and the truth of the matter is, you have to build for your members.  If you know that the majority of your members are over 50 yrs of age, if it common sense to assume many of them are using outdated browsers and older machines which simply cannot render much of what CSS3 has to offer..

              • It's a classic case of "just because you can, doesn't mean you should."

                Of course, you could solve this all by adding this to your site:

                <script language="javascript">
                <!--
                if (navigator.appName == "Microsoft Internet Explorer") {
                document.location = "https://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/browser/";
                } else {
                document.location = "http://www.domain.com/realhomepage.html";
                }
                // -->
                </script>

                Just kidding of course ;-)

This reply was deleted.

Search the Creators Network

Latest Activity

Bernard Lama replied to Bernard Lama's discussion Killer Tip : How to add seach bar to your ning 3.0 network ?
"You are most welcome buddy. And I'm sorry I forgot to attach the code. Here you go :D
<!--CUSTOM G…"
36 minutes ago
Bernadette Arthur replied to Bernard Lama's discussion Killer Tip : How to add seach bar to your ning 3.0 network ?
"Thanks for checking Bernard!  I promise it didn't work before!  LOL!

Where's the code that I can r…"
41 minutes ago
Bernard Lama replied to Shruti Shah's discussion Cancelling Ning Network
"When the cancellation process is done then they won't change you any money.You will get notificatio…"
41 minutes ago
Bernard Lama replied to Bernard Lama's discussion Killer Tip : How to add seach bar to your ning 3.0 network ?
"Hi Bernadette,
When I tried to search Bernadette then it worked perfectly. The following screenshot…"
47 minutes ago
Garfield Archivist left a comment for Jennifer Connelly
"Welcome!"
6 hours ago
Petter Næss, Daniella Breen, Jonathan Stegman and 4 more joined Ning Creators Network
22 hours ago
John Bizley replied to John Bizley's discussion Brand New Facebook Style Photo's page. CODE NOW AVAILABLE
"Thanks George, yes that was a copy error as in the original it only had the one function but the up…"
23 hours ago
George H. Compton IV replied to George H. Compton IV's discussion (TIP) Ning 2.0 responsive fullwidth network at any screen resolution. :O Cellphones to TV's ;)
"You're welcome and thank you for the compliment. It makes me happy knowing you like the end results…"
yesterday
Strumelia replied to Mary Jane Peterson's discussion getting 500: Unexpected Error site down
"I'm getting a lot of these errors on my Ning 2.0 site today.  Anyone else?
I've filed a new support…"
yesterday
Steve C replied to George H. Compton IV's discussion (TIP) Ning 2.0 responsive fullwidth network at any screen resolution. :O Cellphones to TV's ;)
"George,
Thank you for all your help with getting my responsive design set up. It was above and beyo…"
yesterday
Bernadette Arthur replied to Bernard Lama's discussion Killer Tip : How to add seach bar to your ning 3.0 network ?
"Www.Cfaolc.ning.com

Thanks for taking the time to look at it Bernard."
yesterday
George H. Compton IV replied to George H. Compton IV's discussion TIP Ning3 & Ning2 - Sub-tab down arrow for your navigation
"Updated 5-26-15 I added an extra snippet of Java so the star will not display."
yesterday
George H. Compton IV replied to George H. Compton IV's discussion (TIP) Ning 2.0 responsive fullwidth network at any screen resolution. :O Cellphones to TV's ;)
"You're welcome :-)"
yesterday
Bernard Lama replied to Bernard Lama's discussion Killer Tip : How to add seach bar to your ning 3.0 network ?
"Hi there, 
the code is ok. Can you show me your site so I can take a look and solve the problem?"
yesterday
George H. Compton IV replied to John Bizley's discussion Brand New Facebook Style Photo's page. CODE NOW AVAILABLE
"John, the Java in your "IMPORTANT :UPDATES TO THE PHOTOS PAGE CODE" is a little messed up. I'm sure…"
yesterday
JFarrow replied to Traddie's discussion Advise On The Best Way To Achieve This
"I would use Google Drive as you can then have direct access to everyone who can see it.  I'd create…"
yesterday
Lorenzo M. Oliver replied to Lorenzo M. Oliver's discussion Problemas con la visualización de las imágenes in Ning Networks en español
"Gracias a tí, por tu interés y gratitud al mencionarlo!"
Monday
Lorenzo M. Oliver replied to Leyda Ramirez's discussion Directorio de redes ning? in Ning Networks en español
"Hola Leyda,
Hasta hace poco estaba funcionando un buscador de redes sociales Ning, Ningogle, con má…"
Monday
Mary Jane Peterson replied to Mary Jane Peterson's discussion Fatal error: please help
"Hi John Bizley 

thank you so much :D"
Sunday
Luke Jones replied to Luke Jones's discussion Comet chat are genuinely awesome
"Yep :) , it is aha :) O don't forget comet chat are having the apps in 3 weeks time so you can have…"
Sunday
More…