Current status of the Ning Platform is always available on the Ning Status Blog.

Forum

NC for Hire

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS CSS4

There has never been a CSS4. There will never be a CSS4. CSS4 is not a thing that exists.

The term "CSS3" refers to everything published after CSS 2.1.
CSS is on its last version as a language as a whole, so it would be appropriate to just drop the number entirely and refer to everything from now on as just "CSS".

"But", you might object, "I saw things like CSS4 Images, or Selectors 4! Aren't they part of CSS4?".

No. As I just said, there is no CSS4.

I recently was contacted by someone needing help on their network who explained to me that the 'other guy they were talking to' promised to make their site CSS4 compatible.  Then they asked me when CSS4 was going to be available.  So, here is your answer the next time a swindler tries to take your money while trying to promise you the world.  

Actually, promising you the world would be better because the world actually exists.  CSS4 doesn't.  Just fair warning.

You need to be a member of Ning Creators Network to add comments!

Join Ning Creators Network

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascading_Style_Sheets#CSS_4

    http://www.w3.org/TR/selectors4/

    Still, someone promising to make a site CSS4 compatible is silly (right now).

    • NC for Hire

      While trying to finish CSS 2.1, the CSSWG realized that big monolithic "versions" weren't any good. They were difficult to maintain, and slow to develop.

      Instead, they decided to split up the CSS language into a bunch of independent modules. Each module can level up independently, and contains only a smallish set of features, so it's harder for a large set of features to be slowed down by a single stubborn feature.

      Some of our modules start out at level 3, if they extend something from CSS2.1. Others start out at level 1, if they're something new (for example, Flexbox). However, the level that a module is at has no correlation with what version of CSS it's in. They're all CSS3 (or just CSS), regardless of what level they're at.

      Our URLs don't help the matter much, of course. We use URLs with things like css4-backgrounds in them, which totally sounds like CSS4.  All that means is that it's CSS Background & Borders Level 4, which is implicitly part of CSS3 (or just CSS).

      So, now you know. There's no such thing as CSS4. There is only CSS, and each module can level up independently. Pass it on!

      • Ok, so you are quoting one guy who is seemingly arguing semantics http://www.xanthir.com/b4Ko0

        However, if I look at w3c, I see mention of CSS 1, CSS 2.1, Selectors Level 3 and Selectors Level 4. So are you going to say that anyone who says "CSS3 compatible" is a swindler also? Its semantics really, and I think its a little over the top to accuse someone of being a swindler because they called something CSS4 instead of "Selectors Level 4."

        • NC for Hire

          i never accused anyone directly of being a swindler and yes as the link above describes, there is a difference.  I am constantly trying to help NCs who more often than not have little knowledge of web development sift through the lies that some people tell them to make a buck.  that is all.  i appreciate your feedback as it is equally helpful for trying to 'turn a light on' in the mind of NCs who believe anything they are told when they need help.  And btw, the guy I am quoting is well respected and knows what he is talking about.  I believe you know what you are doing as well Ron and value your input.  Please feel free to inject anything else you may know related to this subject for my own edification as well as that of others..

          Thanks Ron..

          • No problem, and thanks for not taking me the wrong way - For a technical IRC chatroom semantics argument, the author is correct. But the point I'm trying to make is that developers inappropriately use terms all the time, and it doesn't necessarily mean they don't know what they are doing or are trying to mislead anyone. 

            That being said, I think the important part that we both neglected to mention in this discussion is that "CSS4 compatible" or even "CSS3 compatible" are ambiguous terms that should raise eyebrows for website owners for a completely different reason. Unless the term means that they aren't using any deprecated features or syntax, that usually means they are using new features. 

            If I put a bunch of features in your site that are from CSS3, that means a large block of your users with older browsers won't be able to see any of the new features, and since many designers don't know what the term "graceful degradation" means, let alone bother implementing it, more often than not, the user will be faced with giant blank spaces or jumbled elements that are not only hideous, but don't even make sense. 

            • NC for Hire

              excellent points!   I see a lot of misuse of the text shadowing and towering, insets, strokes etc all of the time on Ning networks and the truth of the matter is, you have to build for your members.  If you know that the majority of your members are over 50 yrs of age, if it common sense to assume many of them are using outdated browsers and older machines which simply cannot render much of what CSS3 has to offer..

              • It's a classic case of "just because you can, doesn't mean you should."

                Of course, you could solve this all by adding this to your site:

                <script language="javascript">
                <!--
                if (navigator.appName == "Microsoft Internet Explorer") {
                document.location = "https://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/browser/";
                } else {
                document.location = "http://www.domain.com/realhomepage.html";
                }
                // -->
                </script>

                Just kidding of course ;-)

This reply was deleted.

Search the Creators Network

Latest Activity

TJ @ jQueryHelp replied to Alan's discussion Adding Java Script
"Hi The Builder,

Looks like you're trying to add a div and some js using x$ in the Custom Code Head…"
4 hours ago
Lea Scott replied to John Bizley's discussion NEW: VIDEO PAGE USING A BLOGS PAGE: See what you think so far
"Ohhh I see ;)
Thought I was missing out on some perk lol!"
5 hours ago
steve replied to Jamie Baker's discussion Ning 3.0 Tips, Tools and more.
"This is a great idea.. im sorry to say Ning creators is dying a slow horrible death and this is ver…"
5 hours ago
The Builder :) replied to Alan's discussion Adding Java Script
"Hi Jen dont work for me in my ning 3 site. I need  add  this code in head seccion of my custom code…"
10 hours ago
Ben Carr replied to Ben Carr's discussion Ways to Overcome the Activity Feed
"Thanks Steve. We have had this layout for a long time though and are considering some changes just…"
11 hours ago
John Bizley replied to Jamie Baker's discussion Ning 3.0 Tips, Tools and more.
"Just added my application Jamie :-)"
13 hours ago
Kos replied to Brendan Dunleavy's discussion Login Panel on Homepage
13 hours ago
Jamie Baker replied to Jamie Baker's discussion Ning 3.0 Tips, Tools and more.
"The very first, thanks Diane. I've added some posts and will continue to add more, plus I'll be rev…"
13 hours ago
Writer Chick {Diane} replied to Jamie Baker's discussion Ning 3.0 Tips, Tools and more.
"I'm a member already.  Looking forward to some helpful tips and positive posts!  :D  Thanks for the…"
13 hours ago
Jamie Baker replied to Jamie Baker's discussion Ning 3.0 Tips, Tools and more.
"Thanks John, I look forward to seeing you there, be great to have such a top tipster on board ;)"
13 hours ago
Jamie Baker replied to Jamie Baker's discussion Ning 3.0 Tips, Tools and more.
"Great to see you on board Justin, thanks for the support."
13 hours ago
Jamie Baker replied to Jamie Baker's discussion Ning 3.0 Tips, Tools and more.
"Thanks Bernard"
13 hours ago
John Bizley replied to Jamie Baker's discussion Ning 3.0 Tips, Tools and more.
"Good luck on the site Jamie, will come over and Join to post some tips etc."
15 hours ago
John Bizley replied to John Bizley's discussion NEW: VIDEO PAGE USING A BLOGS PAGE: See what you think so far
"Thanks JF, still a little to do on the detail page and also next is to figure out how to get those…"
15 hours ago
John Bizley replied to John Bizley's discussion NEW: VIDEO PAGE USING A BLOGS PAGE: See what you think so far
"Thanks Ceddy"
15 hours ago
John Bizley replied to John Bizley's discussion NEW: VIDEO PAGE USING A BLOGS PAGE: See what you think so far
"Thanks Thiago, still a little to do but nearly there :-)"
15 hours ago
John Bizley replied to John Bizley's discussion NEW: VIDEO PAGE USING A BLOGS PAGE: See what you think so far
"Thanks Jamie"
15 hours ago
John Bizley replied to John Bizley's discussion NEW: VIDEO PAGE USING A BLOGS PAGE: See what you think so far
"Lea yes I do pay for the other site as this will become something else at some point."
15 hours ago
JFarrow replied to John Bizley's discussion NEW: VIDEO PAGE USING A BLOGS PAGE: See what you think so far
"nice work John!"
15 hours ago
Aubrey Williams, Courtney Cunningham, Brendan Dunleavy and 4 more joined Ning Creators Network
15 hours ago
More…