Are fewer groups and forums actually better when starting a network?

I am creating a network that will be a community where people in a specific profession will interact, network, and collaborate online. As I am planning for the early look and feel of my network, I find myself conflicted on how to strike a balance between complexity and simplicity.

On the one hand, I lean toward having a single forum or group that would be a general community discussion area. The advantage I see is that early on it will centralize interaction and create a high density of activity. As the network grows, new groups and forum categories would be created based on the interests of community members.

On the other hand, I lean toward starting with multiple groups tailored to different practice areas, work settings, etc. These groups would be the main areas of interaction and activity on the network. The advantage here is that individuals with specific experiences and interests will be able to jump into areas they feel are relevant to them and meet like-minded people which could heighten their interest in the network; however, it could also create a very fractured network early on, so much so that the conversation never really gets going.

Does anyone have any advice or experience to share on what approach seems to create the highest level of engagement and interest from network members early on? What approach did you take early on and would you go back and change it if you could?

Tags: Forums, Groups, Starting a network

Views: 166

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I guess it depends what the profession is and how it could be broken down. I run a legal network which had an active forum until I decided to try and channel it into groups, then the chat died. Now I'm promoting the main forum again. You live and learn.
SP

That's really interesting. What made you decide to channel the conversation into groups initially after your early success with the forum? What has made you decide to promote the forum again?

i had been admin  of 3 networks mine  i started i had 28 forum categories and the wide range of topics generated instant activity as well as more searcy h traffic

the other 2 had 3-5  categories a d even though thsey had 3 times the members  there was almost no activity at all

i had the creators of those add more forum categories and within a week activity went way uop

1 of the most acrtive forums i ever seen has 400+ categories

Thanks for sharing; it sounds like in your experience that having more categories early on was beneficial. Why do you think that is?

In my experience less is more, so, fewer categories and groups in your community will generate more interaction.

Thanks Thiago, how have you seen fewer categories spur more interaction? Have members of your community commented on this?

Guys - 

What about the forum settings itself ?  Any ideas which ones work better for interaction ?

Discussion Style

The replies on discussion pages are:

  • Flat: replies are shown in chronological order
  • Threaded: replies are indented below the post or reply they respond to

Main Discussions Page Style

On the main Discussions page, show:

  • Categories
  • Latest Discussions by Time
  • Latest Discussions by Category

i hate hate hate this style cause after a certauin number of level,s of  replies u no longer can reply i use flat  yoiu can see the flat here www.dreadlockssite.com

 i despise the threadesd they have ion creatoirs  cause it only alows i think 5 leve,s of repliesmain page latest by time on main discussion page laTEST BY CATEGORY

WITH FLATits all scronological last post is always last   and you quoute what your replying to (if its not direcr=tly under)  with this style the latest reply couldld be on page 2 4 12 anywhere

and as you see u only get so many levels of replies

once you reply  so many levels deep the conversation ends cause u no longer can reply to the thread

whgich i think this will be the last reply i can make in this thread...

with flat style it can go on and on for years

RSS

Latest Activity

Chris replied to JFarrow's discussion 'Ning Emails Going to Spam?'
"Nope, had all the answers: "it's not a bug", "it is a bug and has been…"
48 minutes ago
Larry Matthews replied to Larry Matthews's discussion 'Photos'
"www.dismyhood.com I need to enlarge images on mouseover, on the activity feeds. There is a feed for…"
1 hour ago
Fabio replied to Phil McCluskey's discussion 'Site Manager Updates for Ning 3.0 Networks'
"F A N T A S T I C !!!!! well done guys"
1 hour ago

NC for Hire
Jen replied to Jen's discussion 'Jen's Running List - Updated 4/6/2013' in the group The Sandbox
"Hi Allison, I have a Client who needs the Search feature. Any updates? I don't see any Search…"
1 hour ago

NC for Hire
SweetPotato replied to Phil McCluskey's discussion 'Site Manager Updates for Ning 3.0 Networks'
"not consistently for all browsers, think SE tried it with mixed results. SP"
2 hours ago
Riccardo Rossini replied to Phil McCluskey's discussion 'Site Manager Updates for Ning 3.0 Networks'
"Sp, can I style also the scroll bar of the browser?"
2 hours ago
Dustin Craig replied to John Bizley's discussion 'Show Your Ning 3.0 Sites'
"Appreciate the tip! I probably won't add this to my current site, but it might be a nice touch…"
3 hours ago

NC for Hire
Bernard Lama replied to Alexander's discussion 'Text Ticker in Ning Bar'
"You are welcome Alex. I'm glad to help you..."
3 hours ago

© 2013   Created by Ning.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service