Are fewer groups and forums actually better when starting a network?

I am creating a network that will be a community where people in a specific profession will interact, network, and collaborate online. As I am planning for the early look and feel of my network, I find myself conflicted on how to strike a balance between complexity and simplicity.

On the one hand, I lean toward having a single forum or group that would be a general community discussion area. The advantage I see is that early on it will centralize interaction and create a high density of activity. As the network grows, new groups and forum categories would be created based on the interests of community members.

On the other hand, I lean toward starting with multiple groups tailored to different practice areas, work settings, etc. These groups would be the main areas of interaction and activity on the network. The advantage here is that individuals with specific experiences and interests will be able to jump into areas they feel are relevant to them and meet like-minded people which could heighten their interest in the network; however, it could also create a very fractured network early on, so much so that the conversation never really gets going.

Does anyone have any advice or experience to share on what approach seems to create the highest level of engagement and interest from network members early on? What approach did you take early on and would you go back and change it if you could?

Tags: Forums, Groups, Starting a network

Views: 170

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I guess it depends what the profession is and how it could be broken down. I run a legal network which had an active forum until I decided to try and channel it into groups, then the chat died. Now I'm promoting the main forum again. You live and learn.
SP

That's really interesting. What made you decide to channel the conversation into groups initially after your early success with the forum? What has made you decide to promote the forum again?

i had been admin  of 3 networks mine  i started i had 28 forum categories and the wide range of topics generated instant activity as well as more searcy h traffic

the other 2 had 3-5  categories a d even though thsey had 3 times the members  there was almost no activity at all

i had the creators of those add more forum categories and within a week activity went way uop

1 of the most acrtive forums i ever seen has 400+ categories

Thanks for sharing; it sounds like in your experience that having more categories early on was beneficial. Why do you think that is?

In my experience less is more, so, fewer categories and groups in your community will generate more interaction.

Thanks Thiago, how have you seen fewer categories spur more interaction? Have members of your community commented on this?

Guys - 

What about the forum settings itself ?  Any ideas which ones work better for interaction ?

Discussion Style

The replies on discussion pages are:

  • Flat: replies are shown in chronological order
  • Threaded: replies are indented below the post or reply they respond to

Main Discussions Page Style

On the main Discussions page, show:

  • Categories
  • Latest Discussions by Time
  • Latest Discussions by Category

i hate hate hate this style cause after a certauin number of level,s of  replies u no longer can reply i use flat  yoiu can see the flat here www.dreadlockssite.com

 i despise the threadesd they have ion creatoirs  cause it only alows i think 5 leve,s of repliesmain page latest by time on main discussion page laTEST BY CATEGORY

WITH FLATits all scronological last post is always last   and you quoute what your replying to (if its not direcr=tly under)  with this style the latest reply couldld be on page 2 4 12 anywhere

and as you see u only get so many levels of replies

once you reply  so many levels deep the conversation ends cause u no longer can reply to the thread

whgich i think this will be the last reply i can make in this thread...

with flat style it can go on and on for years

RSS

Latest Activity

Jelena replied to John Bizley's discussion 'New Adjustments For Your Video Player To Make It Stand Out From The Site Background'
"WOW nice  and great work John."
31 minutes ago
Thiago Santos de Moraes replied to Elshara Silverheart's discussion 'More Feature Requests'
"I'm asking Ning about this on Twitter."
1 hour ago
deedee gauzot joined md's group
Thumbnail

Templates, Codes, Scripts and Tweeks

This group is for the Ning guru's who help us regular folks out with all the TCS & T we need to…See More
2 hours ago
deedee gauzot favorited Michael Goebel's group Creators Suggestions for Ning
3 hours ago
deedee gauzot joined Michael Goebel's group
Thumbnail

Creators Suggestions for Ning

A place for Creators and Ning design staff to get together and discuss ideas to enhance and improve…See More
3 hours ago
deedee gauzot favorited SweetPotato's group Theme Designs
3 hours ago
deedee gauzot joined SweetPotato's group
Thumbnail

Theme Designs

A group for Creators and Designers to share, buy and sell, and discuss their Ning Design Studio…See More
3 hours ago
deedee gauzot joined kid k's group
Thumbnail

Ning French Networks

A group for french network creators!See More
3 hours ago

© 2013   Created by Ning.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service