Hi there!

 

To add an swf to a site I just uploades the swf and than paste an object-tag linkig to the file in the html-editor. I enter a width of 852 px. Then I save and get the result. The swf is sized down to 712 px. If I look at the source code o the actual page i see an object-tag with a width oft 712 px.

 

This guy seems to have the same problem: http://creators.ning.com/video/preguntas-a-ning-creators.I found a solution using an iframe. But for different reason this solution is not good for me. Has anyone got a solution to put a swf bigger than 712 px on the actual page without using iframes?

 

Thanx

 

Roland

Tags: 712, object, px, swf, width

Views: 184

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It is because the modules have a css style that only allows max width of images and such. Try wrapping it in a div and styling that or change the CSS of the module to allow for greater max width of images and objects.

Hello Sweet Potato!

 

Thank you for your help! I tryed wrapping it in a div and styling it. I gave the div a color so I can see it. The result it, that the div is shown in full size (880 px), but the swf within that div is still sized down to 712 px. So i think it is not css, that makes swf´s shrink, but "ning". It really gives me back a object-tag with a width of 712 px. There is written "712" in the html-source-code. If it would be a matter of css, there should still be the original size written in the source code.

 

Am I right? Is there another solution?

 

Thanx

 

Roland

 

 

Is it live on your site? What's your URL? I'll take a look tomorrow if I can

The site ist not released yet, and it is currently a closed network. But I would like to invite you, so that you can have a look at it. please send me your email via pm, and i invite you! i sent you a friend request! thank you!

 

RSS

Latest Activity

Margie replied to Phil McCluskey's discussion 'Site Manager Updates for Ning 3.0 Networks'
"That's really good to hear about groups.  That's our site's main…"
7 minutes ago
soaringeagle replied to Alex's discussion 'More styling in the Design Studio'
"sweet awesom e job tho im using text badges and have a feeling that wont look so sweet im gonna go…"
15 minutes ago
Margie replied to Phil McCluskey's discussion 'Site Manager Updates for Ning 3.0 Networks'
"AGREE 100% on groups.  We are not interested in blogs.  Our groups are the main…"
19 minutes ago
Thiago Santos de Moraes replied to John Bizley's discussion 'Show Your Ning 3.0 Sites'
"The green background is not good to read."
59 minutes ago
Strumelia replied to Shannon's discussion 'VOTE - NING 2.0 or NING 3.0'
"Huh??  Can you elaborate on this please?  or point us to where this is stated or shown?"
2 hours ago
Cindy replied to Allison Leahy's discussion 'What is your Ning 3.0 URL?' in the group The Sandbox
"I coppied all the stuff you posted and I'll check a bit later when the head feels clearer. I…"
6 hours ago
Kos replied to Allison Leahy's discussion 'What is your Ning 3.0 URL?' in the group The Sandbox
"Sorry for that.  Sometimes they fall between the cracks during the week b/c so many have full…"
6 hours ago
Kos replied to Allison Leahy's discussion 'What is your Ning 3.0 URL?' in the group The Sandbox
"Yes sometimes we need to step back and let it all sink in as 3.0 is quite different from the 2.0 we…"
6 hours ago

© 2013   Created by Ning.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service