Current status of the Ning Platform is always available on the Ning Status Blog.

Forum

Hide module for signed in members?

I'd like to completely remove the default ning signin/up box which ive done.

I'd like to replace that with a text box containing an image with an "image map" that will contain links to both the signup and sign in pages.

My question : Is there any way I can have this module visible to guests, then once they have signed in have it hidden?

You need to be a member of Ning Creators Network to add comments!

Join Ning Creators Network

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • NC for Hire

    Yeah why not. You can customize your sign up/sign in page without removing it. BTW, do you mean something like I've done in my network here ?

    • Similar to that, but i was going to remove the box completely rather then edit it. My idea was to use the photo (see below) in a basic text box using an image map for the links, then once members are signed in, that text module is no longer visible.

      I do however like what you've done as well which would be my second choice if this isn't an option.

    • yes; I would like to customize this how your page is done! Would you be able to help? thanks, Mandy

  • I would highly recommend George Compton on any and all design changes. Hope this helps you.

  • Hi Matt!

    Of course it can be simply done. Here is how.
    Your module is named "signinBox" (it's an example) like that :

    <div id="signinBox">put your signin signup box here</div>

    You must put this code in your custom code box :

    <script type="text/javascript">
    function boxVisibility(){
      try{
        if ((typeof(ning) == "object") && ning){
          if (ning.CurrentProfile){ // Member of network : hide box
            if (document.getElementById) { document.getElementById('signinBox').style.visibility = 'hidden';}
          }
          else { { // Anonymous visitor : show box
            if (document.getElementById) { document.getElementById('signinBox').style.visibility = 'visible';}
          }
        }
      }
      catch (e){ // Error : show box
        if (document.getElementById) { document.getElementById('signinBox').style.visibility = 'visible';}
      }
    } ;

    boxVisibility();

    </script>

    And that's all folks!

This reply was deleted.

Search the Creators Network

Latest Activity

Just Asking replied to ⚡JFarrow⌁'s discussion MODE ADS ? Really?? Anyone Else?
"This is actually scary when you point all that out. That's the kind of thing that Experience Projec…"
3 hours ago
Garfield Archivist replied to ⚡JFarrow⌁'s discussion MODE ADS ? Really?? Anyone Else?
"Looks like they went away."
4 hours ago
Kos replied to ⚡JFarrow⌁'s discussion MODE ADS ? Really?? Anyone Else?
"I checked Suzie's 2.0 and there's nothing there (yet). You have to laugh - they don't finish buildi…"
5 hours ago
Garfield Archivist replied to ⚡JFarrow⌁'s discussion MODE ADS ? Really?? Anyone Else?
""
5 hours ago
Just Asking replied to ⚡JFarrow⌁'s discussion MODE ADS ? Really?? Anyone Else?
"That's so weird. I didn't get them, but I'm glad you asked about a fix. I'll be popping that code i…"
6 hours ago
⚡JFarrow⌁ replied to ⚡JFarrow⌁'s discussion MODE ADS ? Really?? Anyone Else?
"nope they just started showing up, but i had to remove them because like 40 members were complainin…"
6 hours ago
Just Asking replied to ⚡JFarrow⌁'s discussion MODE ADS ? Really?? Anyone Else?
"Oh my gosh. They just appeared on a Ning 2 site? You don't run any other ads at all that you could…"
7 hours ago
⚡JFarrow⌁ replied to ⚡JFarrow⌁'s discussion MODE ADS ? Really?? Anyone Else?
"add this to your design studio CSS
#glm-sto-tel1-wrap {  display: none!important;}"
7 hours ago
Mandy replied to ⚡JFarrow⌁'s discussion MODE ADS ? Really?? Anyone Else?
"OMG just noticed them today!
How can we stop these, opt-out? I don't want them either!"
7 hours ago
Kos replied to ⚡JFarrow⌁'s discussion MODE ADS ? Really?? Anyone Else?
"Not me but my site doesn't have the draw that yours does."
7 hours ago
Garfield Archivist replied to Shelli Poole's discussion Facebook sign-in app gives a clue to Ning 2.1 coming?
"Hi Shelli
The thing you'll have to distinguish for anyone reading this is if the 2.1 is referring t…"
12 hours ago
Kos replied to Alyce Keegan's discussion Problems reverting to old site theme
"Hate to say it but I'm not having any problems on my 3.0. Sorry"
13 hours ago
Anam replied to Alyce Keegan's discussion Problems reverting to old site theme
"No response so far. I hope others are submitting tickets on this issue as it is platform wide."
23 hours ago
⚡JFarrow⌁ replied to Shelli Poole's discussion Facebook sign-in app gives a clue to Ning 2.1 coming?
"not sure i follow how this is an indicator of Ning 2.1  can you elaborate?  thanks"
yesterday
⚡JFarrow⌁ replied to Alyce Keegan's discussion Problems reverting to old site theme
"yes,,, the reversion back to a previous theme is a huge problem.  and there are others. forexample…"
yesterday
Fire-Tech replied to Alyce Keegan's discussion Problems reverting to old site theme
"I appreciate it. My biggest concern is reliability. I've heard that mixing up between different plu…"
yesterday
Shelli Poole replied to Shelli Poole's discussion Facebook sign-in app gives a clue to Ning 2.1 coming?
"Sighhhh no one cares. I'm secure."
yesterday
James Gatlin is now a member of USA NING CREATORS
yesterday
Just Asking replied to Alyce Keegan's discussion Problems reverting to old site theme
"I had to get addons from just about every company out there to make it do everything I wanted. and…"
Thursday
Fire-Tech replied to Alyce Keegan's discussion Problems reverting to old site theme
"Yeah, SE with all of the SEAO addons look to be best for me. I can handle the code part.. just hear…"
Wednesday
More…