Current status of the Ning Platform is always available on the Ning Status Blog.

Forum

See the news here http://gigaom.com/2013/03/25/remember-ning-once-buzzy-social-network-has-relaunched-again-as-a-publishing-platform/

RB

You need to be a member of Ning Creators Network to add comments!

Join Ning Creators Network

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Hey RB, what do you make of Eliza's write up? I think it misses the mark in a lot of ways. Ning 3.0 will be much more powerful than a publishing platform. Publishing is a big part of the upgrade, as is responsive design, but facilitating discussion and creating opportunities for proactive collaboration is what Ning has been and will always be about. Social aggregation and distribution is increasingly important, and 3.0 offers more tools to achieve this as well, but creating space for interaction is what makes publishing relevant and have impact, IMO. 

    • Yes Allison and that's why way back in 2008 (are you already at NING at that time?) I've choose NING to pay for a service instead many so called competition you had at that time and, as I told many times at Creators, I'm was a very happy one, I keep the content and NING develops a platform, something I suposed to be as a kind WP. XOOM, Joomla continuous developing and improving platform.

      "I think it misses the mark in a lot of ways" Really, Allison? I suppose NING should do a better PR and not guilt the reporter and act fast to fix missinformation of press, I have nothing to do with it.

      When NING came with a such wannabe much better product (still under construction, in a phase we can easely call alpha) that not includes crucial parts of finnished product, and asking me to help develop it and trying selling it is marveous, I just don't get. And you can see that press or part of it didnt too.

      This was one example that came up to me and I just want to share it as information to you know that's how outside are getting your move.

      Sure NING have the motive, the means and the opportunities to do so, and since still there's no a real competition on the market (none I can find) for my needs and I can stay the way I am: NING 2.0 still rocks!

      If the NING 3.0 will be better than 2.0 I really need to see when it's finished because 2.0 is amazing, but since you will be dropping URL Rewriting Tool, as Aaron told here, will kill a big part of my bussiness I really do not think so.

      NING 3.0 could be really 7th maveous of the new internet but your PR and sense of oportunity in make the news out, as a serious big corporation - and I very sorry in say that, really sucks!

      NING need to have an ombundsman, someone to talk for their customers, a payed professional in the director board with veto power, to keep the balance and speach for us, one that can even disagree with NING and sometimes save Glam Media investors money.

      I really wish a peacefull and nice easter to all you and yours!

      • Hi RB,

        Judge us again in the summer... 

        in terms of Eliza and her write-up I think its actually rather fair. we have lots to prove etc  we're up for the challenge. 

        rome wasn't built in one day.

        we have a clear strategy, we have the team and the resources to deliver - hopefully you'll tag along for the journey

        regards,

        -bernard

      • Radialistas, I wasn't aboard in 2008; you've got some Ning years on me! Also think it's great that you're bringing attention to this article. Didn't intend to "guilt the reporter," rather wanted to open up the conversation. ;-) 

  • This reply was deleted.
  • Compelling article.

  • I still see Ning as a sleeping giant.... However as Radialista mentioned, good PR will make a hell of a difference.... Keep up the good work guys!

    • Good PR is key but it starts with good word-of-mouth by you all.

      thanks,

      -b

      • Respectfully- Indeed so, sir, it starts and ends with customer word-of-mouth.   

  • This was an interesting read, especially since I've been fiddling around with Tumblr for the past week, having become bored with mucking around my Ning 3.90 site. I've been with Tumblr for a few years, but never used it much. It wasn't until a week ago that I began experimenting and finding that I can do so much more than I initially thought. 

    Right now I'm considering whether or not I still need Ning, something that becomes more crucial for me to consider as I now have folks willing to invest in my concept next month. The questions before me are: do I want to spend time trying to build membership, or would I prefer to regularly publish quality blogs? I could do the latter with Ning, but the price would be far too high. My investors are interested in purchasing two Ning sites, and that's a lot of work for me, and I maybe able to do it with just one Ning or stick with Tumblr.

    The other thing that appeals to me about Tumblr (aside from being free) is that we have certain freedoms not permitted at Ning. In addition to bands, I also promote alt models, and I've become acquainted with not a few photographers. When it comes to social networking platforms, Tumblr is the only safe haven on the internet for models, artists and photographers these days (Pheed balked at the last minute when they realized their commercial potential). 

    Since the announcement of Ning 3.0, it was my intention to keep both my primary (Ning) site, and all of my satellite websites/social accounts. Despite the fact my investors will be paying for the full year for my Ning site and not me, I need to be cautious that I do not spend their cash unwisely. 

    The other thing I have to consider is the absence of the ability for my artists share their music, seeing as they will not be able to add SoundCloud or ReverbNation widgets to their profile page. Maybe Ning isn't the place for musicians to share their music, or to interact and share music with fans any more. In which case, I would do better taking my team of journalists and photographers somewhere we could provide coverage of bands, and news and editorial content for fans, without requiring anyone to sign up.

This reply was deleted.

Search the Creators Network

Latest Activity

Kos replied to George H. Compton IV's discussion "TIP" widen your network too 1202px
"thin/thin/wide.  Notice the signin is on the left"
48 minutes ago
George H. Compton IV replied to George H. Compton IV's discussion "TIP" widen your network too 1202px
"Okay Kos, which theme and layout did you want this for?"
1 hour ago
George H. Compton IV replied to Steve C's discussion Different Ways to Make Ning 2 Sites Mobile-Friendly by April 21
"Okay you can give it a shot. Here's a link to the tip.. :) It'll work with all layouts & themes
Nin…"
1 hour ago
Zachary Moonshine replied to Luke Jones's discussion I NEED!! to make money from my website soon
"than again i totally wouldnt feel right charging membership for what we can offer using ning 3 at t…"
4 hours ago
Zachary Moonshine replied to Luke Jones's discussion I NEED!! to make money from my website soon
"i don't think we can charge for membership on 3 unless its a new box to check that i have not seen…"
4 hours ago
Kos replied to John Bizley's discussion Another Variation Of My Clean Type Photo Page
"I haven't had time to comment but this is slick John.  Great job!  Found your code here http://thet…"
5 hours ago
Zachary Moonshine replied to Dan "JR" Goodman's discussion 3.0 vs 2.0
"plus being that it is a 3rd party chat that is actually iframed onto the ning3 site i think it has…"
6 hours ago
Zachary Moonshine replied to Dan "JR" Goodman's discussion 3.0 vs 2.0
"yes i use chatwing and it is great and that is the page that 90% of my traffic go to but is not for…"
6 hours ago
Kos replied to Dan "JR" Goodman's discussion 3.0 vs 2.0
"Chat though can be added using a 3rd party; as many things can."
7 hours ago
Zachary Moonshine replied to Dan "JR" Goodman's discussion 3.0 vs 2.0
"NING 3 looks great on mobile devices and the Blogs and forums is where it shines but it has no chat…"
7 hours ago
Zachary Moonshine replied to Mary Jane Peterson's discussion Power by ning
"Don't listen to me i still haven't had my coffee this morning on a more positive note i wonder is i…"
8 hours ago
Zachary Moonshine replied to FedMedic's discussion Sliders anyone?
"I am using Powr for free on my 3.0 site and it works great too also looks great and fast on mobile…"
8 hours ago
Zachary Moonshine replied to Mary Jane Peterson's discussion Power by ning
"I say screw em they don't care about you why care about them, what are they really gonna do stop ta…"
8 hours ago
Vander NG replied to Ning's discussion Update to Product Roadmap and Communication Changes
"I have been using Ning for 6 years, and yes, I love Ning from my day one, especially the support fr…"
21 hours ago
Kos replied to FedMedic's discussion Sliders anyone?
"POWR is cool, even the free. Diff sizes, diff. fonts, diff. displays and location...........etc."
yesterday
Fire-Tech replied to FedMedic's discussion Sliders anyone?
"Yeah, I know all too well my friend :)"
yesterday
FedMedic replied to FedMedic's discussion Sliders anyone?
"I just got back on here to read the suggestions. I'll let you know when I try Fire-Tech's suggestio…"
yesterday
FedMedic replied to FedMedic's discussion Sliders anyone?
"Hi Fire-Tech, I removed the code. Sorry it took me so long to get back here. Being in the fire busi…"
yesterday
Luke Jones replied to Luke Jones's discussion My member's can't use the Emoji's when their using their phones
"Ah right,will check then,thanks Kos :)"
yesterday
Kos replied to Luke Jones's discussion My member's can't use the Emoji's when their using their phones
"I would check w/them, then a/b mobile."
yesterday
More…