Generally, my Ning site seems to do pretty well in Google serach ranking. But for some reason photos added on the gallery fare a lot less well on image search. Anyone know why?
You need to be a member of Ning Creators Social Network to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
Some interesting articles related to community management, digital marketing etc. could be found in our digest. Don't hesitate to leave a feedback so we would know that we should continue :-)
Latest Activity
"NING support is useless anymore...I have respnded three times asking questins to a message they…"
due to personal problems I have not been online anymore, I apologize so much and I am happy to be…
"IL PROBLEMA È SEMPRE LO STESSO, NING GLI OPERATORI... DEVONO ELIMINARE I COOKIE SUL VOSTRO SITO"
"I'm no IT expert by any means, but out of curiosity have you tried entering the chat room from the…"
"Then add the recent price hike email that Ning has notified to be taking effect soon, I'm not…"
In November we began to notice Chat "freezing up" and when we would refresh the page, it would…
UpdateMerry ChristmasToday I woke up totally frustrated and determined to do something.At the end…
"Update
Merry Christmas
Today I woke up totally frustrated and determined to do something.
At the…"
Merry Christmas
Today I woke up totally frustrated and determined to do something.
At the…"
Replies
Usually, google Searches look for the direct link to the image in order for it to show up on image searches. If the link isn't directly viewable from the extension end point, it may not be included at all.
Think about it this way. Every ning site comes out of the box with basically the same language. Photo, Videos Groups, Discussions... those page names are the same across the board.... until you change them in the Language editor...
If your network is about widgets... you need page titles like Photos of Widgets, Widget Videos, Groups Who Widget, Widget Discussions..
i have quite a few tips about this in my archive...hope this helps
Thanks for the tips guys.
Amber, could you clarify to a non-techie what your reply means in terms of what I'd need to do to address it?
JFarrow, I think I understand what action you're suggesting, but the non-image pages which are built under the same logic seem to perform in search regardless. Any idea of why that might be?