Generally, my Ning site seems to do pretty well in Google serach ranking. But for some reason photos added on the gallery fare a lot less well on image search. Anyone know why?
You need to be a member of Ning Creators Social Network to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
Some interesting articles related to community management, digital marketing etc. could be found in our digest. Don't hesitate to leave a feedback so we would know that we should continue :-)
Latest Activity
"Found this post with more complaints about the Ning3.0 malfuntioning for members in the comments…"
"I just read your post here,now I'm no IT expert but I just went to your site and my antivirus didnt…"
"Oh Eva thanks for this post,... Yeah Ning 03 sucks big time alright!!, you get no notifications on…"
"Thanks for your help, ⚡JFarrow⌁I'm having some health problems at the moment, which is why I'm only…"
"I just sent you my contact info in a message. Call me and ill talk with you about some options.."
" One way to get your activites in groups to show up in your feed is to combine the feeds from…"
"Yes, this is one of several problems with the Activity Feed in Ning 3.0!"
"It is annoying and tedious not to see when a member joins a group. Or if there is a new group! Just…"
Replies
Usually, google Searches look for the direct link to the image in order for it to show up on image searches. If the link isn't directly viewable from the extension end point, it may not be included at all.
Think about it this way. Every ning site comes out of the box with basically the same language. Photo, Videos Groups, Discussions... those page names are the same across the board.... until you change them in the Language editor...
If your network is about widgets... you need page titles like Photos of Widgets, Widget Videos, Groups Who Widget, Widget Discussions..
i have quite a few tips about this in my archive...hope this helps
Thanks for the tips guys.
Amber, could you clarify to a non-techie what your reply means in terms of what I'd need to do to address it?
JFarrow, I think I understand what action you're suggesting, but the non-image pages which are built under the same logic seem to perform in search regardless. Any idea of why that might be?